home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On Thu, 4 Apr 1996, Simon Yardley wrote:
-
- > All the excitement got to me ...
- >
- > I know a 32 Mhz Bus Falcon won't be as fast as a TT ... as everything will still be
- > transfered in 16 bits ...
-
- ...But then again, the TT only accesses RAM with 16 MHz !...
-
- Frankly, my FX-Falcon feels just like a TT subjectively - sometimes even
- faster. And, really, it _is_ faster than a TT without TT-RAM :) !
- The relative speed compared to TT w. Fast-RAM varies a lot due to
- different programs. Those programs accessing memory very heavily, may
- perform better on a TT. Those programs relying on CPU-speed tend to
- be faster on FX-Falcon. The differences are small, though.
-
- For some odd reason, an unaccelerated Falcon drove MicroProse F1GP
- much faster than a TT without TT-RAM... I still wonder, why ;-)
-
- Greetings,
- Tommi
-
-